Skip to main content

The Theory and Practice of Online Teaching and Learning - Critique

 

The book Theory and Practice of Online Teaching and Learning, a Guide for Academic Professionals offers tips and advice about the online teaching and learning processes. In order to explore what is in vogue in the world of online teaching and learning, the book provides guidance to those educators to whom the internet still remains an unknown zone. The purpose of this paper is to examine the chapters of the book and evaluate it in terms of balance and consistency to accomplish the intended objectives.

The present paper delineates specific concerns which should be revised by the authors. Chapter one is an excerpt of Teaching Online written by Ko (2010) It explores some of the basic points about teaching online and tries to answer some common questions about this. The excerpt is out-of-date, because it belongs to the 3rd edition, from the year 2010, while this book is now in its 4th edition, which was released in the year 2017. Maybe this is the reason why some of the comments seem out of time. For instance, it presents the limitations of online courses as opposed to on-site lessons, and highlights the little interaction between learners and instructors that takes place in online courses. Clearly, if the author had considered online lessons through video calls, she would not have mentioned these limitations in online lessons. In addition, the rest of the chapter is limited to presenting some reflections about online teaching but it fails to provide new information or valuable advice for educators. Chapter 2 consists of an extract from Essentials of Online Course Design by Sosulski, and Vai (2015). The objective of this chapter is to provide key characteristics for asynchronous and synchronous teaching and learning. It would have been preferable if the characteristics had been well explained and cited correctly. Chapter three is about e-tivities, as author Salmon calls them, to refer to collaborative activities that can be adapted to different situations. A certain extent of e-tivities description is found as regards definition, purposes, needs to produce them, and audience to be addressed. Nevertheless, the stories presented do not provide a clear example related to the topic previously mentioned. Chapter four is an excerpt of the book Learning Online. In this chapter, Means, Bakia, and Murphy (2014) propose an extensive system to categorise online teaching methods considering four dimensions: context, design, implementation, and outcomes. Each detailed dimension, in turn, contains sub-categories. This framework could be helpful for educators to become aware of the myriad of possibilities available in the field of online courses. Nevertheless, it errs on the excessive level of detail, since trying to classify a course according to such a great number of categories and subcategories could become a tedious task that is neither reasonable nor functional. 

In the case of chapters five and six, concepts about the online education field are finely developed. Chapter five is from Reusing open Resources. The book written by Littlejohn and Pegler (2014), explores how the use of open resources changes the online teaching and learning experiences. The chapter successfully sheds light on the effects that open sources have had on the decentralization of education and how this phenomenon has made it possible for learning to cross boundaries to other contexts of everyday life. In chapter six, Laurillard (2013) examines the relationship between technology and education and posts a red flag to educators about the effects of technology on education. Presumably, this warning is about the role of educators to ensure that in the future education harnesses technology and not vice-versa. 

In conclusion, whereas the analysed book presents some suitable descriptions, it also exhibits several weaknesses. Firstly, considering that this is a book designed for educators, the guide could have been more innovative if it had struck a balance within the material by applying simpler instructions where necessary. Furthermore, detailed descriptions should be included to facilitate the readers’ comprehension and prevent them from being misled on relevant topics. 

 

 References:

American Psychological Association. (2019). Publication manual of the American

Ko, S., & Rossen, S. (2010). Teaching online: A practical guide. Routledge.

Laurillard, D. (2013). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.

Littlejohn, A., & Pegler, C. (2014). Reusing open resources: Learning in open networks for work, life and education. Routledge.

Means, B., Bakia, M., & Murphy, R. (2014). Learning online: What research tells us about whether, when and how. Routledge.

Salmon, G. (2013). E-tivities: The key to active online learning. Routledge.

Vai, M., & Sosulski, K. (2015). Essentials of online course design: A standards-based guide. Routledge.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reflections on Virtual Education - Public Summary

  Especially intended for professional educators interested in imparting online lessons, the book Theory and Practice of Online Teaching and Learning, a Guide for Academic Professionals offers some guidance about teaching and learning online practices. The purpose of this paper is to provide a public summary of the book. The first chapters allude to some general regards of online teaching and learning. They highlight the idea that online teaching bears many similarities with on-site teaching. Likewise, they emphasize some aspects which are particular of the former, like ways of interaction, roles of instructors and learners, time management, and kinds of activities, among others. Furthermore, the book presents a framework for categorizing the multifariousness of proposals for online learning, considering different dimensions. Chapter five makes reference to the wide availability of educational online resources due to the widespread tendency to share them freely. It also expl...

Annotated Bibliography: The Effect of Feedback on Students’ Performance

Yamashita, T. (2021). Corrective feedback in computer-mediated collaborative writing and revision contributions.  Language Learning & Technology, 25 (2), 75–93.   http://hdl.handle.net/10125/73434   In this article, Yamashita (2021) effectively investigates the consequences that corrective feedback in in-class computer-mediated collaborative writing has on grammatical effectiveness in learners' success and individual performance. The writer convincingly insists on the fact that collaborative tasks help students in real-world interactions and contribute to individuals’ second language acquisition. According to Chandler (2003) and Ferris & Roberts (2001), direct corrective feedback is related to the provision of the correct form and it promotes foreign language acquisition.  Methods, as well as research procedures of the study, are explained in detail and reflect interesting facts. Furthermore, Yamashita (2021), claims that computing-mediated platforms provided...